4 year old Jandre Botha murdered for refusing to call lesbian daddy
Greegor - 21 Nov 2006 10:27 GMT
South Africa
Botha (Lesbian bio Mom) let her 'partner' kill her son
Lesbian couple guilty of gruesome murder
Baldwin Ndaba
March 23 2006 at 05:30AM
Four-year-old Jandre Botha refused to call his mother's lesbian lover"daddy" - and paid with his life.Jandre's father, Jan Botha, was in the Vereeniging regional court'spublic gallery on Wednesday when his former wife, Hanelie Botha, 31,and her partner, Engeline de Nysschen, 33, were found guilty of thegruesome murder of his son.He sat in court holding the hands of his fiancée, Yolanda Deysel, andlistened attentively to magistrate Rita Willemse, who, in her judgment,accepted evidence that among the reasons that led to Jandre's brutalordeal was his refusal to call De Nysschen "daddy".The court had heard evidence from Lydia Nkomo and her daughter AlettaLesiba, who worked for the couple in their tuckshop, that De Nysschenhad viciously assaulted Jandre while demanding that he must call her"daddy".'His mother should have been aware of this'Both testified that while Jandre was assaulted, his mother failed tointervene or protect him. Evidence showed he had sustained horrificinjuries, including a fractured skull and brain damage, as well asbroken legs, collarbone, hands and pelvis.The court accepted the evidence of Professor Mohammed Dada, a traumaexpert, who said the boy's injuries were similar to those of a personwho had fallen from a double-storey building.Delivering judgment, Willemse acknowledged there was no substantialevidence linking Hanelie to the assaults, but said she was equallyguilty of murder for failing in her legal duty to protect her childagainst abuse and violation.The court found she had lied to Dr Elna Gibson, one of the medicaldoctors who treated Jandre, by saying the boy obtained his injuriesafter he had slipped in the bath.The court ruled that she had lied to protect De Nysschen. The doctorswho had examined Jandre dismissed the pair's version that he hadslipped in the bath. They said excessive force was required to inflictthe kind of fatal injuries sustained by Jandre.'She did nothing to protect her own child'Convicting the two, Willemse dismissed their version and said there wassubstantial medical evidence before her about the nature of theinjuries suffered by Jandre."I accept the evidence of the medical personnel who are experts intheir fields. There were substantial documents placed before me. Mostof them have medical experience which spans over a period of 15 years."All of them have dismissed the version of the accused and wereunanimous that the deceased's injuries were inflicted over a period oftime."It is unthinkable that the mother of the child could not have knownabout these fatal injuries. The deceased also had broken legs, and hismother should have been aware of this."The magistrate criticised Hanelie for failing to report Jandre's abuseat the hands of her lover to the social workers monitoring Jandre'sprogress, after she had gained custody of him during a lengthy courtbattle with her ex-husband. She also failed to report the abuse to herex-husband.The boy's father became aware of Jandre's abuse only on the day of hisdeath, June 12, 2003. De Nysschen contacted him and said Jandre hadfallen earlier in the day and had died.Willemse criticised Hanelie's fitness to be a mother, saying herparents later approached her ex-husband and gave him financial help tofight for the custody of his child.Rebuking Hanelie, Willemse said: "Hanelie was not helpless. She waswell aware of Engeline's violent outburst."She could have called the child's father for help but she failed to doso. She did nothing to protect her own child."The magistrate labelled Engeline a liar and a hopeless witness who hadcontradicted herself in testimony.Hanelie and De Nysschen were further convicted of assault with intentto do grievous bodily harm and child neglect for failing to provide orseek treatment for Jandre's limb fractures.
The case was postponed until June 26 for a pre-sentencing report.News updates - March 24, 2006 24 March, 2006 StarThe Gauteng Department of Social Development is investigating a case ofnegligence against a social worker following the death of a 4-year-oldchild. The government is expected to study the finding of a VereenigingRegional Court magistrate who ruled that Denise Herbst, who was taskedto monitor Jandre Botha while under the care of her mother, failed to do so.
Jan Botha says the courts and social workers were to blame for thedeath of his son Jandre. Four years ago, Botha laid criminal chargesagainst his former wife and her lesbian partner for abusing his child.
Courts failed my son - dad The father of a four-year-old boy, who was beaten so badly for refusingto call his mother's lesbian lover "Daddy" that he died of hisinjuries, says the courts and social workers are to blame for the deathof his son.Little Jandre Botha sustained horrific injuries, including a fracturedskull and brain damage, as well as broken legs, collarbone, hands andpelvis, in the vicious assaults.Jan Botha, Jandre's biological father, was in the public gallery of theVereeniging Regional Court this week when his former wife, HanelieBotha, 31, and her partner, Engeline de Nysschen, 33, were found guiltyof the brutal murder of his son.He sat in court holding the hand of his fiancée, Yolanda Deysel, andlistened attentively to magistrate Rita Willemse, who, in her judgment,accepted evidence that among the factors that led to Jandre's brutalordeal was his refusal to call De Nysschen "Daddy".Four years ago, Botha laid criminal charges against his former wife andher lesbian partner for abusing his child. A Mokopane (Potgietersrus)court dismissed the case against Hanelie Botha and De Nysschen. Later,he tried to gain custody of the child, but was denied.Botha recounted how the court had failed to accept his version that thetwo women were mistreating his child soon after his divorce in 1999.Commenting on their murder conviction, Botha said: "I am very happythat the court of Vereeniging has accepted my version of my child'sabuse at the hands of the two, because the law and the social workersin Potgietersrus failed me."It was proven in court this time that the social workers whorecommended that Hanelie must get custody of Jandre did not do theirjob properly. I laid an assault charge against them four years ago."A year before Jandre's death, the court dismissed the matter on thegrounds that there was no evidence. This was even though Jandre hadbeen absent from pre-school several times - now proved to have been theresult of serial beatings."There was enough incriminating evidence against them, but they werelet free. I'm happy that the prosecution in this case did its jobproperly," Botha said.The magistrate criticised Botha's fitness to be a mother, saying herparents had later approached her ex-husband and had given him financialhelp to fight for the custody of his child.Willemse also labelled De Nysschen a liar and a hopeless witness whohad contradicted herself in testimony.Botha and De Nysschen were further convicted of assault with intent todo grievous bodily harm and child neglect for failing to provide orseek treatment for Jandre's limb fractures.The trial was postponed until June 26 for a pre-sentencing report.Dad blames social workers for son's deathBaldwin Ndaba March 23 2006 at 09:42AMJan Botha says the courts and social workers were to blame for thedeath of his son Jandre.Four years ago, Botha laid criminal charges against his former wife andher lesbian partner for abusing his child.A Mokopane (Potgietersrus) court dismissed the case against HanelieBotha and Engeline de Nysschen. He later tried to gain custody of thechild, but was denied.Botha recounted how the court had failed to accept his version that thetwo women were mistreating his child soon after his divorce in 1999.'I'm happy that the prosecution in this case did its job properly'Commenting on their murder conviction on Wednesday, Botha said: "I amvery happy that the court of Vereeniging has accepted my version of mychild's abuse at the hands of the two, because the law and the socialworkers in Potgietersrus failed me."It was proven in court (Wednesday) that the social workers whorecommended that Hanelie must get custody of Jandre did not do theirjob properly. I laid an assault charge against them four years ago."A year before Jandre's death, the court dismissed the matter on thegrounds that there was no evidence. This was even though Jandre hadbeen absent from pre-school several times - proven now to be due toserial beatings."There was enough incriminating evidence against them, but they werelet free. I'm happy that the prosecution in this case did its jobproperly," Botha said.Lesbian couple accused of murder November 18 2005 at 02:54AMIn January 2003 the high court ordered that 4-year-old Jandre Botha beplaced in the care of his mother.Five months later he was dead - allegedly at the hands of his motherand her lesbian lover. The state believes that Jandre was a victim ofserial abuse perpetrated by the people who were charged with caring forhim.On Thursday, the boy's mother, 30-year-old Hanelie Botha, and herpartner, 32-year-old Engeline de Nysschen, stood in the dock at theVereeniging regional court charged with murder, assault with intent todo grievous bodily harm, child molestation and negligence.On June 12, 2003 Jandre was declared dead. The coroner's report saidthe cause of his death had been a fatal blow to his head. Both womenpleaded not guilty in October last year to all counts.Jandre was a victim of serial abuseDuring the trial, the court heard chilling evidence of abuse: Jandrehad had a broken pelvis which had never been treated; his right handand left collar bone had also been broken but he had never receivedmedical care.Botha refused to testify under oath to rebuke substantial medicalevidence that Jandre had been a victim of serial abuse. Instead, shesubmitted a statement to the court pointing the finger of blame at herlover.She said that on June 2, 2003, her partner had arrived at their home inDrie Rivier, Vereeniging, with food for them but had become angry whenshe realised they had already eaten."She had earlier phoned me and said I should not cook dinner becauseshe would bring food for us. I had ignored her order because we werevery hungry earlier that day.Upon realising we had eaten already, she became furious and insistedthat Jandre eat the food she had brought," the statement read. She saidJandre had tried to eat but had vomited, prompting De Nysschen toassault him repeatedly with a slipper.She was doing this 'to instil discipline in him'"I grabbed my child and removed him from her. Later on the two of uswatched TV while Jandre was in the bath. Then we heard Jandreshrieking."Botha said they had taken him to hospital and De Nysschen had orderedher to tell the hospital authorities that he had fallen in the bath.The hospital's medical staff discovered that he had a blue mark on hissternum which could have been sustained more than a month previously.Earlier the court heard that in 2002 Jandre's father, Jan Botha, hadsuspected that Jandre was being abused and had contacted authorities. Adoctor confirmed his fears and Jandre was placed in foster care.However, in January 2003, Botha successfully applied to the high courtto have Jandre returned to her custody.State prosecutor Deon Barnard used the extensive medical evidence togrill De Nysschen in an attempt to prove that both women had abusedJandre. De Nysschen said Botha had assaulted Jandre on numerousoccasions. She said Botha had always said she was doing this "to instildiscipline in him".De Nysschen testified that she, too, had occasionally slapped Jandrewhen he was naughty, but denied she had used brute force. She said theonly time she had assaulted Jandre was on June 2 when she had punchedhim hard in his face. The case was postponed until November 30. -Mercury Correspondent This article was originally published on page 3of The Mercury on November 18, 2005
Showing posts with label Lesbians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lesbians. Show all posts
Tuesday, 22 February 2011
Saturday, 19 February 2011
Karla Homolka - Child Rapist, Torturer and Killer
One of Canada's most infamous female convicts, Karla Homolka, was released from prison after serving a short 12-year sentence for her involvement in drugging, raping, torturing and killing young girls over a decade ago. The dead teens included her own young sister whose innocence was offered by Homolka to her boyfriend as a gift.
Karla Homolka was born on May 4, 1970 to Dorothy and Karel Homolka in Port Credit, Ontario. She was the oldest child of three, well adjusted, pretty, smart, popular and received ample love and attention by friends and family. Karla developed a passion for animals and after high school she went to work at a veterinary clinic. On outside appearances, everything about Karla seemed normal. No one suspected that she was hiding deep psychotic desires that had yet to be unleashed.
Homolka and Bernardo Meet:
At age 17 Homolka attended a pet convention in Toronto and met 23-year-old, Paul Bernardo. Like Homolka, Bernardo was an attractive blonde, appeared to be smart and charmingly persuasive. The two had sex on the day that they first met. They quickly discovered that they shared the same sado-masochistic desires, with Paul moving quickly into the position of master, and Homolka willingly taking the role as slave, obsessed with fulfilling Bernardo's every fantasy.
Scarborough Rapist:
Over the next few years the relationship between Homolka and Bernardo intensified and they shared and encouraged each other's psychotic behavior. It was during this time that Bernardo was involved in raping women with the approval of Homolka. The uncaught Bernardo was dubbed as the Scarborough Rapist by the police and the media. His specialty was to attack women getting off of busses, making them endure violent anal rape and different levels of humiliation.
A Surrogate Virgin:
One of Bernardo's constant complaints with Homolka was that she was not a virgin when they met. Homolka, devoted to pleasing Bernardo every way possible, knew of his attraction to her 15-year-old sister, Tammy, whose virginity was intact. The two decided that they would force Tammy into being a surrogate virgin for her older sister. To help accomplish this, Homolka stole the animal anesthetic, Halothane from the vet clinic where she worked.
Death In Exchange for Pleasure:
On December 23, 1990, at a Christmas party at the Homolka family home, Bernardo and Homolka served Tammy alcoholic drinks spiked with halcyon. After family members retired, the two took Tammy to the basement and Homolka held a cloth soaked in Halothane to Tammy's mouth. Once Tammy was unconscious the couple raped her. During the rape Tammy began choking on her own vomit and ultimately died. The drugs in Tammy's system went undetected and her death was officially ruled an accident.
Replacing Tammy:
Homolka and Bernardo, unscathed by the death of Tammy, moved in together. Bernardo blamed Homolka for Tammy's death and complained that she was no longer around for Bernardo to enjoy sexually. Homolka decided a teenager named Jane would make a good replacement. She was young and virginal and seemed to idolize the attractive and older Homolka. Homolka invited the unsuspecting teen out to dinner, and like with Tammy, she spiked the girl's drinks then invited the intoxicated teen to her home.
Another Present for Bernardo:
Once there, Homolka administered the Halothane, and presented her present, the young pretty Jane, to Bernardo. The couple then engaged in brutal sexual attacks of the unconscious teen, capturing the events on videotape. The next day when the teenager awoke, she was sick and sore but had no idea of the violation her body had endured. Jane, unlike others, was one victim that managed to survive the encounter with the couple.
Leslie Mahaffy :
The thirst for Bernardo to share his rapist activities with his lover Homolka increased. On June 15, 1991 Bernardo kidnapped Leslie Mahaffy and brought her to the couple's home. Bernardo and Homolka repeatedly raped Mahaffy over a course of several days, videotaping many of the assaults. They eventually killed Mahaffy and cut her body into pieces, encased the pieces in cement, and threw the cement in a lake. On June 29 Mahaffy's remains were found by a couple canoeing on the lake.
Bernardo and Homolka Marry:
June 29 was also the day that Bernardo and Homolka were married in an elaborate wedding held at the Niagara-on-the-Lake church. Bernardo had been in control of the wedding plans which included the two riding in a white horse-drawn carriage with the bride dressed in an expensive white gown. The wedding guests were served a lavish sit-down meal after the couple exchanged their vows which included, at Bernardo's insistence Homolka vowing to "love, honor, and obey' her new husband.Kristen French On April 16, 1992, the couple kidnapped 15-year-old Kristen French from a church parking lot after Homolka lured her to their car, pretending to need directions. The couple brought French to their home and for several days videotaped their acts of humiliating, torturing and sexually abusing the teen. French tried hard to survive the attack but right before the couple left for Easter Sunday dinner with Homolka's family, they killed her. Her body was found on April 30 in a ditch in Burlington.
A witness to the kidnapping of Kristen French contacted police with a description of the car suspected as being used during the assault. The witness, unable to identify the car make, selected a white Camaro as the closest looking to the car she saw. As a result, the billboard was put up by the police with a Camaro pictured as the car make used during the kidnapping. Bernardo actually drove a Nissan, which looked nothing like the Camaro.
Where Is The Female Pervert, Child Rapist, Torturer And Murderer Karla Homolka?
Ok. Lets see. Whatever did happen to the person who society deems to be one of the superiors in this world due to her hue. (skin color) This same superior female, (white woman) took great delight and pleasure in 1) Raping young girls 2) Torturing young girls 3) Raping her own sister 4) Watching her husband Paul _____ rape her sister. 5) Murdering her sister. OK, I think I'll save your stomach. But she also did a whole lot more. So, what happened to this sick, evil individual? She struck a plea bargain with the Canadian (obvious crooked and perverse) legal system, served only 12 years in prison for her sick crimes. She is now out and living i the Caribbean - in the Bahamas apparently. Where is the justice in that? If her whereabouts is not made totally public to the people who are being forced to live with her in their midst, (and I doubt very much it will be) all I can say is, God help them. God help the people who have had this sick pervert put amongst them without them even knowing it. How disrespectful. Totally disrespectful. God help that community. I pray God protects them, especially the innocent children.
COMMENTS FROM ANOTHER SITE I FOUND INTERESTING
i think anyone who thinks this lady deserves a secound chance at life is a dumb f*** ing idiot...... honestly she MURDERED and RAPED her SISTER ,I'm honestly worried about her son ..sexual abuse?? yeah pretty big thing ..she should never and i mean never be aloud to have a child ..take care of a child or be with anyone under the age of 20 ...she's an unstable person.... you all can't say she's paid her time she's lied alot and you know what she got prosecuted for what she told them theres alot more shit she did that the police are not aware of I'm sure of it ..and the her supposed boyfriend or maybe hubby now yeah GROSE you touching a woman that hand her hands on young children does it feel good knowing your fucking a child rapist ..ewwww i hope you catch something and die ...as for you miss KARLA yeah KARLA miss I'm so scared people are going to hurt me i moved away ...ok if anything we should be scared your going to go after our children ..honeslty do you have any respect for the families you've hurt ..do you have any idea how much their hurting knowing you havea child after you took theirs ..your an ignorant piece of shit ..i hope your never happy and i hope you remmember every day that you killed your own sister aswell as two other beautiful girls that didn't get their chance to shine upon life thanks to you...you can't say you were scared you can't say you were helpless you weren't you had a choice and you fucked up royaly your a dirty slut that shouldn't be giving the time of day ....
As someone from St. Catharines, the only reason she got 12 years was because Paul's lawyer hid the tapes of the crimes until after her plea bargain was granted. She would be doing life as well if they had seen those tapes before hand. Did you also know that she has not apologized to one of those families yet? I would have been terrified to leave jail if I were her. I'm surprised/impressed she's still alive.
I know for a fact that Luka Magnotta and Karla Homolka are BOTH living in the Bahamas together and have a son. Luka and Karla have pics together
Karla, I hope you read this! You are one sick individual! Paul (The Scarborough Rapist) never killed to my knowledge, mamed, or tortured until he met you! Not to say Paul is an angel by any stretch but what you did in comparison was night & day! You are very lucky to be somewhat free. How does it feel to be the hunted? It's really just a matter of time before someone, somewhere gets you when you least expect it. Have fun looking over your shoulder for the rest of your life you sadistic B!tch ! I know that if any of the girls were my daughters I wouldn't give it a second thought to hunt you down! Just think, like I said when you least expect it....... ENJOY !
Karla was and probably still is, sick and sadistic, just like Paul, it's a shame that she only served 12 years, she should still be rotting in jail for her crimes- anybody who believes otherwise is not in their right minds- she does not deserve friends, or her freedom- she was directly or indirectly responsible for the deaths of three young children, one of whom was her own sister- the fact that she has never shown any remorse or apoligized to the Mahaffey or French families is example of the pyschopath she truly is...let us not be fooled by a wolf in sheeps clothing ever again!!!!!!
I couldn't agree more with the idea that she should have to register as a sex offender. If someone chooses to hunt her down and kill her, then that's just the way things go. That person will have to pay the consequences of their actions. (unlike Karla, might I add.) Canadian tax dollars are continuing to be wasted to harbor Karla. It is appalling that the government is choosing to protect her! Who was there to protect Kristen French , Leslie Mahaffy, and Tammy Homolka!?! And why hasn't Paul's lawyer been charged with withholding evidence!?! Her deal should've been thrown out the window because she BLATANTLY lied about her involvement in the crimes! The Canadian courts dropped the ball in a major way in this case.
It is not fair that Karla is free and has the opportunity to have a child and raise that child and have a family. The girls whose lives she took will never have that opportunity, and neither should she...
Just watched the documentary, Wicked Attractions, about Karla and Paul's crimes. It was so shocking. I agree with the poster who said, once they determined she had lied, the deal should have been off since the deal was based on what the believed were the facts. She will have to look over her shoulder for the rest of her life, and like Jeffrey Dahlmer, who was murdered in prison, I do believe her fate has to be that of what they both inflicted upon the innocent children they stalked, tortured, raped and killed. My God, she should be in prison for the rest of her life. If she was, I could find some mercy for her knowing that she is paying for her crimes. But she is free, physically, but mentally she is imprisoned which can be just as bad as being in prison, we can only hope. And don't worry, her suffering has not even begun yet. Karma will deal with Karla in her next life. She will be punished, it is inevitable and I just take comfort knowing that she suffers mental anguish and is haunted by her vicious crimes. I do believe she will die a violent death, if not suicide or be institutionalized for insanity. One way or another, I see her suffering mentally and after her death, she will have to answer to God, and this is where she will be in an unenviable position. The child will be OK with its father.
Tuesday, 19 October 2010
Thursday, 30 March 2006
Lesbian Couple Guilty of Gruesome Murder
Lesbian Couple Guilty of Gruesome Murder
4-year old killed for refusing to call his mother's lesbian lover "daddy"
THE STAR By Baldwin Ndaba March 23, 2006
Four-year-old Jandre Botha refused to call his mother's lesbian lover "daddy" - and paid with his life. Jandre's father, Jan Botha, was in the Vereeniging regional court's public gallery on Wednesday when his former wife, Hanelie Botha, 31, and her partner, Engeline de Nysschen, 33, were found guilty of the gruesome murder of his son. He sat in court holding the hands of his fiancée, Yolanda Deysel, and listened attentively to magistrate Rita Willemse
, who, in her judgment, accepted evidence that among the reasons that led to Jandre's brutal ordeal was his refusal to call De Nysschen "daddy".The court had heard evidence from Lydia Nkomo and her daughter Aletta Lesiba, who worked for the couple in their tuckshop, that De Nysschen had viciously assaulted Jandre while demanding that he must call her "daddy".'His mother should have been aware of this'
Both testified that while Jandre was assaulted, his mother failed to intervene or protect him. Evidence showed he had sustained horrific injuries, including a fractured skull and brain damage, as well as broken legs, collarbone, hands and pelvis. The court accepted the evidence of Professor Mohammed Dada, a trauma expert, who said the boy's injuries were similar to those of a person who had fallen from a double-storey building.Delivering judgment, Willemse acknowledged there was no substantial evidence linking Hanelie to the assaults, but said she was equally guilty of murder for failing in her legal duty to protect her child against abuse and violation. The court found she had lied to Dr Elna Gibson, one of the medical doctors who treated Jandre, by saying the boy obtained his injuries after he had slipped in the bath. The court ruled that she had lied to protect De Nysschen. The doctors who had examined Jandre dismissed the pair's version that he had slipped in the bath. They said excessive force was required to inflict the kind of fatal injuries sustained by Jandre.
'She did nothing to protect her own child'
Convicting the two, Willemse dismissed their version and said there was substantial medical evidence before her about the nature of the injuries suffered by Jandre."I accept the evidence of the medical personnel who are experts in their fields. There were substantial documents placed before me. Most of them have medical experience which spans over a period of 15 years. "All of them have dismissed the version of the accused and were unanimous that the deceased's injuries were inflicted over a period of time."It is unthinkable that the mother of the child could not have known about these fatal injuries. The deceased also had broken legs, and his mother should have been aware of this."The magistrate criticised Hanelie for failing to report Jandre's abuse at the hands of her lover to the social workers monitoring Jandre's progress, after she had gained custody of him during a lengthy court battle with her ex-husband. She also failed to report the abuse to her ex-husband.The boy's father became aware of Jandre's abuse only on the day of his death, June 12, 2003. De Nysschen contacted him and said Jandre had fallen earlier in the day and had died.Willemse criticised Hanelie's fitness to be a mother, saying her parents later approached her ex-husband and gave him financial help to fight for the custody of his child.Rebuking Hanelie, Willemse said: "Hanelie was not helpless. She was well aware of Engeline's violent outburst. "She could have called the child's father for help but she failed to do so. She did nothing to protect her own child."The magistrate labelled Engeline a liar and a hopeless witness who had contradicted herself in testimony. Hanelie and De Nysschen were further convicted of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm and child neglect for failing to provide or seek treatment for Jandre's limb fractures.The case was postponed until June 26 for a pre-sentencing report.
This article was originally published on page 1 of The Star on March 23, 2006
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)