“Perv 'Dad' For Fun”

“Frank Lombard is the associate director of Duke’s Center for Health Policy. The university administrator was recently arrested by the FBI and charged with offering up his adopted 5-year-old son for sex. I tried to contact Frank Lombard over the weekend to probe his expertise regarding the health benefits of raping small children. So far, he’s declined to comment.
University administrator Lombard is accused of logging on to a chat room online and describing himself as a “perv dad for fun.” The detective who wisely looked into the suspicious screen name says that Lombard admitted to molesting his own adopted son. All this was before allegedly inviting a stranger to travel to North Carolina from another state to statutorily rape his already-molested adopted son.
More from the article, “… it will be interesting to see how Duke faculty members respond to Frank Lombard. Because he is white, Lombard is fair game at Duke, isn’t he? But Lombard is also gay, so will that complicate things?
Unfortunately for Frank Lombard, the affidavit in support of his arrest warrant shows that this second Duke rape case will also have a strong racial component. According to a confidential source (CS) a man using the user name “cooper2” or “cooperse” logged onto an internet-based video chat room. CS saw him perform oral sex on an African-American child under the age of ten. He also performed other acts on the child, which are too obscene to be described in this column.
The user name “cooper2” has now been linked to Frank Lombard, the associate director Duke University’s Center for Health Policy. A second source has now alleged that ‘cooper2′ has confessed to being ‘into incest’ and that he has adopted two African American children.”

So hear you have a White gay man performing oral sex on a Black child and most media outlets somehow neglect to include that information? Interesting. Well no, not interesting, it is absolutely disgusting! Scandelous! Shameful. If the child had been white it would have been a differerent story with the white supremacist media.

My Comment On The Gay Pedophile Adopter Who Abused Child And Passed Child To Other Pedos For Abuse

May there be a special place in hell for evil, perverted sick bastards like this.

Also for those who place helpless innocent children into the hands of evil, sick peodophile perverts.

Rest assured, one day, you will have to answer to God for it.

Men In My Town

Comments made on another website after the article about the white, male peodophile who adopted an African American boy, abused him and offered him for abuse to other peodophiles.


Pray that the child receives the love and support he will need to grow up strong and live in peace.

My name is Keith Smith. I was abducted, beaten and raped by a stranger. It wasn't a neighbor, a coach, a relative, a family friend or teacher. It was a recidivist pedophile predator who spent time in prison for previous sex crimes; an animal hunting for victims in the quiet suburbs of Lincoln, Rhode Island.

I was able to identify the guy and the car he was driving. He was arrested and indicted but never went to trial. His trial never took place because he was brutally beaten to death in Providence before his court date. 34 years later, no one has ever been charged with the crime.

In the time between the night of my assault and the night he was murdered, I lived in fear. I was afraid he was still around town. Afraid he was looking for me. Afraid he would track me down and kill me. The fear didn’t go away when he was murdered. Although he was no longer a threat, the simple life and innocence of a 14-year-old boy was gone forever. Carefree childhood thoughts replaced with the unrelenting realization that my world wasn’t a safe place. My peace shattered by a horrific criminal act of sexual violence.

Over the past 34 years, I’ve been haunted by horrible, recurring memories of what he did to me. He visits me in my sleep. There have been dreams–nightmares actually–dozens of them, sweat inducing, yelling-in-my-sleep nightmares filled with images and emotions as real as they were when it actually happened. It doesn’t get easier over time. Long dead, he still visits me, silently sneaking up from out of nowhere when I least expect it. From the grave, he sits by my side on the couch every time the evening news reports a child abduction or sex crime. I don’t watch America’s Most Wanted or Law and Order SVU, because the stories are a catalyst, triggering long suppressed emotions, feelings, memories, fear and horror. Real life horror stories rip painful suppressed memories out from where they hide, from that recessed place in my brain that stores dark, dangerous, horrible memories. It happened when William Bonin confessed to abducting, raping and murdering 14 boys in California; when Jesse Timmendequas raped and murdered Megan Kanka in New Jersey; when Ben Ownby, missing for four days, and Shawn Hornbeck, missing for four years, were recovered in Missouri.

Despite what happened that night and the constant reminders that continue to haunt me years later, I wouldn’t change what happened. The animal that attacked me was a serial predator, a violent pedophile trolling my neighborhood in Lincoln, Rhode Island looking for young boys. He beat me, raped me, and I stayed alive. I lived to see him arrested, indicted and murdered. It might not have turned out this way if he had grabbed one of my friends or another kid from my neighborhood. Perhaps he’d still be alive. Perhaps there would be dozens of more victims and perhaps he would have progressed to the point of silencing his victims by murdering them.

Out of fear, shame and guilt, I’ve been silent for over three decades, not sharing with anyone the story of what happened to me. No more. The silence has to end. What happened to me wasn't my fault. The fear, the shame, the guilt have to go. It’s time to stop keeping this secret from the people closest to me, people I care about, people I love, my long-time friends and my family. It’s time to speak out to raise public awareness of male sexual assault, to let other survivors know that they’re not alone and to help survivors of rape and violent crime understand that the emotion, fear and memories that may still haunt them are not uncommon to those of us who have shared a similar experience.

My novel, Men in My Town, was inspired by these actual events. Men in My Town is available now at www.Amazon.com

For those who suffer in silence, I hope my story brings some comfort, strength, peace and hope.

For additional information, please visit the Men in My Town blog at www.meninmytown.wordpress.com
Flag Like ReplyReply
Nicola 1 year ago

You forgot to mention another component to this story...

As I note in my own blog post, Lombard allegedly said in one of his chats that he specifically targeted black boys for adoption because they're easier to adopt than white children.

Can you imagine how many people must have vouched for this man? I'm not very up on adoption procedures, but I imagine you have to jump through all kinds of hoops and get recommendations and all that... not one single sign that this dude was an alleged perv baby-rapist.

This isn't new, orphans being adopted just for abuse, but it sure stings more to know that black children are targeted even more.

I haven't seen too much of this story in the news myself, and I almost skipped over it too b/c of the "plain" headline. Then I read the first graf...

May GOD have mercy on those two children.
Flag Like ReplyReply
edward 1 year ago

The defining attribute should be Gay man, not white man. Studies show a preponderance of man-boy sex among gays.

Abuse of sanity: The truth about how a council allowed the 1st ever gay male couple in the UK to adopt children. Then they abused them.

So politically correct has adoption become, a council allowed these gay paedophiles to foster young boys even, as one mother reveals here, turning a blind eye when presented with evidence of their horrifying abuse

While the events unfolding in her living room were tense and awkward, the young mother did not believe that her unease augured anything more inauspicious or alarming. With the benefit of hindsight, of course, she has now had ample time to reflect on how that gnawing anxiety was justified.

Jailed: Craig Faunch and Ian Wathey

Miss X, as she must be known, had placed her eight-year-old twin boys into foster care in 2004 after finding herself unable to cope with life as a single parent of four boisterous youngsters.
That they had been placed with a gay couple, Craig Faunch and Ian Wathey the first homosexual couple in Yorkshire to be approved by the authorities as foster parents was, she told friends, incidental: she was just happy that someone was taking good care of them.
That sentiment changed, however, when she was shown a compromising naked photograph of her son while they were on one of their regular visits home.
The photo featuring her son urinating was unsettling enough for Miss X to complain to the social services department of her local council in Wakefield, Yorkshire.
It is the sort of serious incident that might, you imagine, herald the start of a strict set of investigative procedures.
Instead, the matter was resolved if that is the correct word over an uncomfortable meeting in Miss X's living room in May 2004, during which, she recalls, 32-year-old Faunch declared that he had taken the photograph to embarrass her son into closing the door when he went to the toilet.
The dubious explanation was enough to satisfy the social services managers present, who brought the inquiry to a swift conclusion (as well as apparently losing the incriminating photograph in the process).
It was to be another eight months before another boy in their care was to raise the alarm.
Eighteen months later, in June last year, both Faunch and Wathey were jailed for a total of 11 years after being convicted of a dozen offences relating to four of the boys in their care.
The pair had looked after 18 children in only 15 months after being approved by the council, but under the guise of caring men offering a helping hand to disadvantaged youngsters, had sexually abused vulnerable children for their own gratification.
Neither man, Leeds Crown Court was told last year, had shown any empathy or remorse.
Both are now serving prison sentences for their despicable crimes.
Nonetheless, the repercussions have continued to rumble, and in a scathing independentlyauthored report issued this week, Wakefield Metropolitan District Council found itself the subject of robust condemnation.
They had, the report concluded, left the couple free to sexually abuse youngsters in their care because of fears of discrimination if they launched an investigation.
By virtue of their sexuality, the report suggested, the men were "trophy carers" who were not subject to the same rigorous assessment as others.
At a time when gay couples can legally adopt children for the first time, the criticism raises serious questions about vetting procedures, as well as
fears that the crimes of two men could have repercussions for genuine gay foster parents.
For Miss X, of course, the issue is a far more simple one: a shocking betrayal of trust.
As she says: "I was so angry when I found out that the council hadn't taken their investigation further and, at least, contacted the police about it.
"I am horrified that they let more children go into that house, It's sick.
"Now, so many more people have also had their lives turned upside down.
"Like others, I trusted them 100per cent and they let me down."
It is a sentiment echoed by the mothers of Faunch and Wathey's two other young victims, not to mention others who have found themselves at the sharp end of council mismanagement.
For it is not the first time that Wakefield council has found its provision of care for disadvantaged young people in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons.
Last month, six care workers formerly employed by the council won a compensation payout estimated to be in the region of £1million in an out-ofcourtsettlement after blowing the whistle on standards of care in the children's homes where they worked.
All of them had been sacked after revealing a shocking catalogue of mismanagement, a raft of failings which included allowing children as young as 12 to engage in sexual relationships, a child worker buying and smoking drugs with children in his care and failures in staff criminal record checks.
Such a depressing litany of failures would seem to have had no bearing on sending the boys to stay with the two men in Sides Road, Pontefract, from the summer of 2003.
Faunch and Wathey had settled in the three-bedroom semi-detached house on a pleasant cul-de-sac five years earlier and, like so many paedophiles, appeared to be perfectly respectable members of society.
This strikingly odd couple 40-year-old Wathey, 6ft tall and thick set was regarded as a quiet, "Gentle Giant" while Faunch is a slim 5ft 6in and nicknamed "Tweetie Pie" at school because of his voice and stature both grew up near Wakefield, West Yorkshire.
The men were living at home with their divorced mothers when they met ten years ago, quickly coming out to their respective friends and families before, in 1998, they decided to move in together.
Money, according to friends, was often in short supply, with both men undertaking a number of distinctly mundane jobs over the years, including working for a local frozen food firm and a mail order home shopping catalogue company.
They seemed, neighbours recall, unlikely trailblazers for gay rights, although in fact Faunch in particular was outspoken on the subject.
And whether or not it was at his behest, five years ago, the couple applied to Wakefield council to become professional foster parents.
When, in July 2003, they received permission, Faunch and Wathey became among the first homosexual couples in England to be approved, and the first in Yorkshire.
The milestone passed quietly enough.
Faunch and Wathey were treated no differently to any other foster parents by social services, passing the same training courses and undergoing the same standard vetting procedures.
Routine checks revealed they did not have a criminal record and had never been in trouble with police, and, with a desperate shortage of foster parents in the Yorkshire area, began their new role in the summer of 2003 as soon as the social services fostering panel formally approved their applications.
The couple's request only to look after boys in the five to 12 age bracket apparently passed unremarked, with managers accepting Faunch and Wathey's explanation that they didn't feel "equipped" to care for girls.
Perhaps social services should have talked to members of the local community, many of whom had a strong sense that it was not pure altruism that had persuaded the gay couple to bring young boys into their home.
As local gossip would have it, it was the money.
Neither man went out to work and appeared to be living off funds from Wakefield's social services department.
Cash was used, according to one neighbour, to fund weekends away with the boys at the nearby seaside resorts of Cleethorpes and Skegness in the motorhome they owned.
Of course, we now know that the couple's motivation was even more sinister: both men were paedophiles.
And less than a year after they had first been approved, Miss X was moved to flag up her concerns to social services.
During one of her regular visits with the twins, a grinning Faunch had shown her the picture of her son urinating during a visit to Butlin's holiday camp in Skegness.
A similar snap had also been taken of the other twin.
Deeply disturbed, the 34-yearold single mother refused to let the twins return to the foster home and lodged an official complaint with the council.
But while a social worker took the offending photograph and promised a full investigation the result, as we have seen, was merely that awkward living room meeting.
After that, Miss X was told nothing of what happened next, left instead to assume that the council had thoroughly investigated the matter.
In fact, far from taking any further action, the council had sent Faunch and Wathey more youngsters, including some with more serious problems, even providing extra bunk beds and a Ford Galaxy people carrier to assist with any transportation problems.
"Moving up in the world," one neighbour ruefully remarked.
Behind the scenes, however, it was the couple's deviancy that had moved on to another level.
Among the new "recruits" to their foster army was a 14-year old-boy with Asperger's syndrome, a form of autism, who spent the weekends with the men to afford his mother some respite care.
With a mental age of seven and learning difficulties, the boy's 36-year- old mother found it hard to juggle her son's special needs alongside those of her other two children-and had turned to Wakefield-social services for help.
"I was at breaking point when Craig and Ian came along," she recalls.
"At the time, it was the answer to my prayers.
"I looked after my son myself during the week and at weekends could recharge my batteries and spend time with the other kids."
How could she have guessed that her son was being sexually abused by the foster carers in the privacy of their home knowing that he was unlikely to say anything because of his condition?
In harrowing evidence given to Leeds Crown Court last year, the boy recalled how Wathey had made him watch gay pornography while he touched himself and, on nine other occasions, had also subjected the boy to an explicit sex act as he lay in bed, telling him he must not tell his mother.
He had also, the boy also told the court, been fondled on several occasions by Faunch as they sat on the living room sofa. "I don't like them anymore," he told the court.
"I want them to go to prison."
Who knows how long this catalogue of abuse may have continued?
In fact, it was only after a fourth child, also aged 14, reported to an adult friend that he had been inappropriately touched that the police became involved.
After one of the incidents, he told the court, he had used a full bottle of shower gel in the shower in a bid to scrub away the memory of the event. "It hurt," he said.
The police were finally informed, and launched an investigation, during which they discovered an indecent video of the fostered twins taking a shower which had been filmed just days after their naked photo had been taken.
Police also uncovered a hardcore gay pornographic film in the recorder of Faunch and Wathey's bedroom.
The film, A Young Man's World, features the exploits of a group of older men lusting after and performing sex acts with young males.
In June last year, Faunch was convicted of five sexual offences of sexual activity with a 14-year-old and two offences of taking indecent photos.
Wathey was found guilty of four offences of sexual activity with another 14-year-old boy and a charge of encouraging a child to watch a gay porn movie.
Neither showed any remorse.
Indeed, it perhaps suggests something of the couple's attitude towards the legal proceedings that just weeks before they stood trial in June last year, the men chose to formalise their relationship in a civil partnership ceremony in Pontefract.
Little wonder that, when sentencing Faunch and Wathey at Leeds Crown Court last summer, Judge Susan Cahill said it was "quite incredible" that the police had not been called in after concerns were initially raised by the mother of the twin boys.
It is a sentiment echoed by the authors of this week's report, who also made 41 recommendations for overhauling the council's fostering process.
Only time will tell, of course, whether these recommendations will be implemented.
In the meantime, the mothers of the boys concerned are left to deal with the emotional consequences behind the bureaucratic machine.
As the mother of the 14-year old with Asperger's put it. "I just do not know the long-term damage this may have done to my son.
"If social workers had done their job and taken the twins more seriously in the first place, my son would never have gone there."
This week, a spokeswoman for Wakefield council declined to comment, declaring it would be "inappropriate" to do so until after a meeting of all council members is held on Wednesday.
"Inappropriate", of course, being rather a key word throughout this sorry saga and one that should have been used far earlier.
Additional reporting by Chris Brooke.

This was the first gay male couple in the UK to be approved for foster care. Social workers said that they were afraid of being labeled homophobes and ignored some signs that would've otherwise indicated abuse.

What utter, grotesque evil cowards! They preferred to allow innocent, helpless male children to be molested, abused and sodomized rather than be called homophobes?

For these sick, perverted sodomite and peodophile enablers may there be a special place in hell.

Becci Hill - Female Peodophile

School Counselor Guilty of Having Sex With an Autistic Child

Becci Hill, 31, was arrested in July 2006, and charged with sexual misconduct and child solicitation. At the time of her arrest, Hill was working as a behavioral counselor at Sanders School in Indianapolis, Indiana. She had been in her position for four years. On the night of her arrest, the police noticed Hill's car parked along a rural road at 3:30 in the morning. Inside the car was Hill and a young boy, both nude and engaging in sex. Upon investigation it was determined that the boy was 15 years old and autistic.
On January 11, 2007, Hill pleaded guilty to sexual misconduct with a minor. According to reports, Hill, once the boy's mentor, had been sexually abusing him for about a year.
She was sentenced to two years in prison, three years probation and she will be required to register as a sex offender.

Woman Guilty Of Sexually Abusing Children

Woman Guilty Of Sexually Abusing Children
6:28pm UK, Monday December 14, 2009

Philip Thomas, Sky News Online

Carol Clarke, a woman described as a "predatory paedophile", has been given an indeterminate sentence for sexually abusing children.

The former English teacher admitted abusing about 100 children, saying she had committed attacks on both boys and girls of primary school age.

They were sometimes carried out by following children into public toilets in Grimsby and other parts of Lincolnshire.

Grimsby Crown Court heard that there was no evidence against her apart from her own confession.

However, a behavioural psychologist who examined the 46-year-old told the court that she had "most likely" offended in the way she described.

Sky's North of England correspondent Gerard Tubb said: "This woman has, through most of her adult life, been confessing to various mental health professionals and to a senior minister in her church, that she was abusing children, that she had very unhealthy thoughts towards children, that she hated children.

"On one occasion she was asked if she would prefer to have treatment or go to the police.

"She chose treatment but it seemed to make no difference.

"On another occasion she was told by the minister in her church to read the Bible when she confessed to him that she had these thoughts about children."

Woman Guilty Of Sexually Abusing Children
6:28pm UK, Monday December 14, 2009

Philip Thomas, Sky News Online

Carol Clarke, a woman described as a "predatory paedophile", has been given an indeterminate sentence for sexually abusing children.

The former English teacher admitted abusing about 100 children, saying she had committed attacks on both boys and girls of primary school age.

They were sometimes carried out by following children into public toilets in Grimsby and other parts of Lincolnshire.

Grimsby Crown Court heard that there was no evidence against her apart from her own confession.

However, a behavioural psychologist who examined the 46-year-old told the court that she had "most likely" offended in the way she described.




Carol Clarke

Sky's North of England correspondent Gerard Tubb said: "This woman has, through most of her adult life, been confessing to various mental health professionals and to a senior minister in her church, that she was abusing children, that she had very unhealthy thoughts towards children, that she hated children.

"On one occasion she was asked if she would prefer to have treatment or go to the police.

"She chose treatment but it seemed to make no difference.

"On another occasion she was told by the minister in her church to read the Bible when she confessed to him that she had these thoughts about children."


Det Sup Phil Walker: 'She's A Dangerous Offender'
It was only last year, when she told a nurse at a psychiatric hospital that she had been driving around the Grimsby area looking for a child to abduct, abuse and possibly even kill, that the police were called in and she was arrested.

In court for sentencing following her guilty plea, Clarke was told by Judge David Tremberg that she posed a serious risk and was jailed for an indeterminate period, with a minimum of four years.

http://antimisandry.com/female-paedop...
http://to-catch-a-female-predator.blo...

White Gay Duke University Expert And Pedophile Charged With Selling Adopted African American 5 Year Old Child For Sex

Gay Duke University Health Expert Charged With Selling Adopted 5 Year Old For Sex.

WARNING: ADULT SUBJECT MATTER.
WARNING: SICKENING SUBJECT MATTER.

Here's the full story from Newsbusters.

Frank Lombard is a white associate director at Duke University’s Global Health Institute and a homosexual who was charged last week with the molestation of his adopted 5-year-old black son and actively trying to sell him for sex on the internet.
The 40 words above are 40 more than the Main Stream Media has said on this horrible story.
In nearly a week since Lombard was arrested, not one national broadcast or cable television news show has picked up the story. Compare this to the weeks on end of sensational coverage of the white male lacrosse players of the same university charged with rape several years ago.
At the time of this post not one television show has reported the story and only 17 newspapers in the United States featured it – a majority of which are only small local newspapers.
And most of these articles cited the American Press’ report on the events, which was as follows:
AP) WASHINGTON – A Duke University official has been arrested and charged with offering his adopted 5-year-old son for sex.
Frank Lombard, the school’s associate director of the Center for Health Policy, was arrested after an Internet sting, according to the FBI’s Washington field office and the city’s police department.
According to an affidavit by District of Columbia Police Det. Timothy Palchak, an unnamed informant facing charges in his own child sex case led authorities to Lombard.
Authorities said that Lombard tried to persuade a person -who he did not know was a police officer -to travel to North Carolina to have sex with Lombard’s child.
The detective’s affidavit charges Lombard identified himself online as “perv dad for fun,” and says that in an online chat with the detective, Lombard said he had sexually molested his son, whom he adopted as an infant.
The court papers say Lombard also invited the undercover detective to North Carolina to have sex with the young boy, and even suggested which hotel he should use.”
In response to the AP report, which most of the newspapers used almost verbatim, Mike Adams of Townhall made the observation that “The Associate Press (AP) did not mention the fact that the five-year old offered up for molestation was black. Bringing that fact to light might be damaging to the political coalition that exists between blacks and gays. Nor did the AP mention that the adopted child is being raised by a homosexual couple. Bringing that fact to light might harm the gay adoption movement.”
With this shocking lack of coverage of an even more shocking story, many are asking why this did not make the front pages and top headlines like the Duke lacrosse team scandal did. Thomas Lifson of American Thinker posited that “identity politics … apparently trumps all sense of outrage.”
Thanks to ECM to alerting me to this story. Notice how this story is not covered as well as the Matthew Sheppard story or the George Tiller story was. I wonder why. I guess some victims of violence are more equal than others.

Duke University Official Caught in Alleged Child Sex Sting

Official Accused of Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old 'Son' for Sex

(Please note that this white male gay pedophile did not have a natural son. Why? Because he is gay and therefore only engages in unnatural sex. He adopted 2 African American children, one a 5 year old male child solely to sodomize and abuse them. So much for the so-called superior race)

A Duke University official has been charged in federal court with offering his 5-year-old adopted son up for sex. Frank Lombard, associate director of the Center for Health Policy, was arrested Wednesday in Raleigh, the FBI said.

In an undated photo provided by the Durham County Sheriff's Office, Frank Lombard is shown. The Duke...
In an undated photo provided by the Durham County Sheriff's Office, Frank Lombard is shown. The Duke University official has been arrested and charged with offering his adopted 5-year-old son for sex. Authorities said that Lombard tried to persuade a person,who he did not know was a police officer,to travel to North Carolina to have sex with Lombard's child. (Durham County Sheriff's Office/AP Photo)
An unidentified informant who already faces child porn charges in a different child sex case pointed investigators to Lombard, according to court documents. The informant told investigators he had met Lombard on the Internet four years ago. The informant described in graphic detail how he allegedly observed Lombard molesting an African-American child on four occasions over an Internet video chat service called ______.
The informant said, according to court papers, that Lombard, who is white, said that he lived in the Raleigh-Durham area of North Carolina and that the child was one of two adopted African-Americans in his custody.
Lombard has been charged with attempting to induce someone to cross state lines to engage in sex with a child, punishable by a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. (What? Is that all?!!!! This bastard should get the death penalty)

Lombard allegedly used the adult Internet service to conduct his video chats. According to an affidavit in support of the arrest warrant, the Internet service indicated that Lombard's profile "stated he was interested in "perv fam fun," a reference to "incestuous child molestation".

" The service also told investigators that a customer service complaint had been sent to the company in January 2007. A customer who had chatted with Lombard complained to the company that Lombard said he was "into incest" and had adopted two African-American children, court records said.
A Washington, D.C., police detective who was investigating the case set up undercover chats with someone matching Lombard's description during which the detective says he was invited to fly to Raleigh to have sex with the person's 5- year-old adopted child. In his affidavit, Det. Timothy Palchak wrote that he engaged in a chat with someone using the screen name "FL" who provided nude pictures of himself. The pictures matched Lombard's North Carolina driver's license photo, according to the affidavit.
During the chats, according to the affidavit, "FL" told undercover investigators that he had himself molested his child, whom he adopted as an infant, and that he had allowed others to molest 'his' child*. "FL" stated that "the abuse of the child was easier when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening, but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the molestation," Palchak wrote in his affidavit.

* It was not actually his child. He is white, the child is not. The child is a precious African American child who belonged to 2 African American parents, who's child the USA deems as inferior to whites and therefore can be given to savage, male, gay pedophiles to be used, abused and violated at will.

** Lombard had also said that he adopted black children because they are easier to get than white children.

Unspeakable Evil

A white, gay Duke University official (the sick b*****d is pictured above) was arrested at his North Carolina home Wednesday (Jul. 1) for selling 'his' adopted 5 year old 'son' online for sex and reportedly sexually abusing the child. The adopted 5 year old child is African Amercan. Pedophile, Frank M. Lombard had also adopted another African American male child. Frank M. Lombard, assistant director for Duke University’s Center for Health Policy was busted for attempting to sell 'his son' to a stranger online, promising him that he could “perform all sorts of sex acts on the child” because he had already done them himself. That stranger Lombard spoke to online just happened to be a D.C Task Force agent.
Upon raiding his home, the FBI found two other children also in his home. When Lombard was asked to explain how he adopted the child, he replied that it “was not so hard…especially for a black boy”.
He will only receive a maximum of 20 years in jail.
We’re sick to the stomach to even be posting something like this but word needs to get out. You can’t just let anyone adopt a child without doing a proper background check on them! Once the inmates find out why he’s there, we’re sure he’ll regret it.

Gay rights campaigner led a double life as leader of paedophile ring that carried out a catalogue of child abuse

A paedophile ring has been smashed after eight men were found guilty of a horrifying catalogue of more than 50 child pornography and abuse charges.
Among the crimes was a shocking sexual attack carried out on a three-month-old baby boy by an executive adviser on child sex issues.
James Rennie, chief executive of a publicly-funded gay rights group, was one of the men exposed yesterday as members of Scotland's biggest paedophile ring.

Rennie, 38, molested the toddler son of unsuspecting friends - a little boy he had been trusted to babysit - recording the abuse and sharing it with other perverts.
In the course of the police investigation, the boy's parents were forced to watch a video of their baby son being violated by Rennie.
Last night, after the eight men were found guilty of a string of child sex charges at the High Court in Edinburgh, the child's parents reacted with disgust.
They said: 'For over 15 years, James Rennie seemed the closest of family friends and it is hard to put into words the extent of the betrayal he has exacted upon us.'
During their investigations, police recovered tens of thousands of still and moving images of the most vile child abuse.

Police sources revealed yesterday that the activities of 70 other men around the UK with links to the case are being investigated.
More than 35 people have been arrested or been subject to enforcement action. Two investigations are continuing in Scotland.
One of the most worrying aspects of the case is the way Rennie was able to reach a position where he could influence Executive policy on child sexuality.
A trained teacher, Rennie became the boss of LGBT Youth Scotland, a publicly-funded support group for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young people.
He took on the £40,000 a year role when the group was set up in 2003 and became the Executive's most important and influential adviser on gay issues affecting children.
Under his leadership, the group backed proposals to allow gay adoption. As well as appearing in the Scottish parliament, he was invited to a Royal Garden Party and to Downing Street.

Yesterday, Rennie, from Edinburgh, was found guilty of indecently abusing the baby boy. The abuse began when the child was three months old and continued for several years. Rennie filmed and photographed himself committing the abuse, sent the images to others and allowed another man to listen on the phone while he molested the child.
He allowed the boy, whom he called his 'nephew', to be abused by another paedophile and also offered him to other deviants in a series of emails.
When his home was raided in December 2007, Rennie had gone to the trouble of hiding computer hard drives, discs and CDs in a gap next to the water tank in his kitchen. Between these storage devices and his laptop computer, he was found to be in possession of thousands of images, many of them at the most extreme level of the scale.
Rennie carried out his vile activities as part of a Scottish paedophile ring swapping images of child pornography on the internet.

He was suspended as soon as LGBT Youth Scotland was told of his arrest in December 2007 and resigned soon afterwards.
Last night, a spokesman for LGBT Youth Scotland, which received £1.1million in 2008 from the Executive, councils and health boards, said: 'We are appalled by the abuse and exploitation of children by James Rennie, and wholeheartedly welcome his conviction. Our immediate thoughts are with the children and families who have been directly, and indirectly, abused by him and the other co-accused also convicted.
'We had no suspicion whatsoever of the crimes James Rennie was committing. He was obviously skilled at hiding his actions and adept at deceiving people. There is no suggestion James Rennie directly threatened the safety of young people accessing our services.'
Last night the Executive said that it would continue to fund LGBT.
When he was arrested, Rennie had a steady boyfriend, but trawled the internet looking for gay sex dates.
He also used the internet to meet other paedophiles, including Neil Strachan, a child molester who was jailed for three years at Edinburgh Sheriff Court in 1997 for abusing a boy of between five and seven.
Strachan, 41, joined Rennie for a sex session with Rennie's 'nephew' at his flat in Meadowbank when the boy was between one and three.
Rennie then boasted about the encounter to another paedophile, Lachlan Anderson, 51, from Cumbernauld, Dunbartonshire. Anderson is currently serving a 20-month sentence after being caught with a collection of child pornography, including images of Rennie abusing the child. He was brought from jail to give evidence at the trial.
Strachan was found guilty of attempting to sodomise a different 18-month-old toddler on the night of Hogmanay 2005 at his flat in the Dalry area of Edinburgh.
Last night, the boy's mother said: ' The anguish I feel towards Mr Strachan is indescribable.
'I feel that no matter what punishment is given to Mr Strachan it will never be able to compensate for the hurt, devastation and great deal of stress brought to me and my family.
'Mr Strachan used and abused our trust in order to satisfy his and others' sick needs.'
Strachan's 23-year-old boyfriend Colin Slaven was cleared of taking part in the sex act, which was photographed and sent to Rennie.
Rennie involved John Milligan, 40, in his sick acts by allowing him to listen to the baby boy being abused.
Milligan also discussed getting his hands on the child - and passed on images of Rennie's abuse to others.
The paedophile ring was uncovered when photos of naked boys were found on Strachan's computer. He handed it in for repair at a company in England in 2007.
A computer engineer found one indecent image of a child on the machine and police were called in.
An examination by Northumbria Police revealed other images.
The inquiry moved to Edinburgh, where Operation Algebra was set up in October 2007 by Lothian and Borders Police.
Detective Superintendent Allan Jones, senior investigating officer in Operation Algebra, said of the men: 'Many of them wouldn't stand out from a general member of the public; but in the background they lead this double life, looking at some of the most vile material you would ever care to imagine.
'Quite what motivates them and why they take this course of action I really don't know. What I do know is we can't be forgiving of it and we've got to pursue it to the nth degree to make sure that this material is stopped.'
A jury found Rennie, Strachan, Milligan, Ross Webber, 27, and Craig Boath, 24, guilty of plotting to arrange access to children to carry out acts of gross sexual abuse. It is the first time a conspiracy charge has been used successfully in Scotland to convict perverts.
Church bell ringer Neil Campbell, 46, was cleared of that charge. But all six, along with Slaven and John Murphy, 44, were found guilty of charges relating to child pornography.
Having been convicted of actual physical abuse of children, Rennie and Strachan face a possible life sentence.
Prosecutor Dorothy Bain, QC, asked for 'a full risk assessment' which would allow the court to impose an order for lifelong restriction - under which a judge imposes a minimum sentence but the accused are only freed when the parole board considers it safe to do so.
They then remain under strict supervision for the rest of their lives.
Judge Lord Bannatyne said: 'I am going to go down that route and investigate an order for lifelong restriction for both these accused.'
All eight men were remanded in custody to await sentence.